tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3731775051101455648.post4446802272913281676..comments2023-04-26T17:11:43.434+03:30Comments on thought++: It doesn't exist if it exists too much...Amir H. Fassihihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17696172671099554479noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3731775051101455648.post-49402383400666229942008-01-08T10:35:00.000+03:302008-01-08T10:35:00.000+03:30I agree that existence is a manifestation of time ...I agree that existence is a manifestation of time exactly. The galaxies will exist if we are not around also ... that would be the objective view of existence.Amir H. Fassihihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17696172671099554479noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3731775051101455648.post-30651238385743543072008-01-08T02:57:00.000+03:302008-01-08T02:57:00.000+03:30Interseting way of looking at time. However I must...Interseting way of looking at time. However I must caution you that perhaps time could be defined without existence of human beings. <BR/><BR/>Also I think existence is a manifestation of time. They are intertwined so that one can not exist without the other. At least that is my opinion.<BR/><BR/>I try to think of it this way, if we were not around would the billions of stars and galaxies in the universe cease to exist? My answer to this question is certainly no.<BR/><BR/>Good luck buddy, these are some ricky waters your swimming. :)Tournesolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07478115924869856691noreply@blogger.com